Wednesday, September 26. 2007
Study: Surface replacement arthroplasty may offer advantages over THA
Canadian investigators said hip resurfacing resulted in greater patient activity
after 2 years.
By Robert Trace
1st on the web (September 19, 2007)
September 2007
SEOUL — Total hip arthroplasty is an established procedure with well-documented
complication rates and clinical results, but surface replacement arthroplasty
may offer additional clinical benefits to many patients, according to a group of
Canadian researchers.
"We decided in 2003 to do a comparative study of hip resurfacing, or surface
replacement arthroplasty (SRA), to the gold standard of total hip arthroplasty (THA),
since we were not aware of any direct prospective studies out there comparing
the two procedures," said Pascal-André Venditolli, MD, of the Maisonneuve-Rosemont
Hospital in Quebec.
He and his colleagues randomly assigned 210 hips to receive uncemented
metal-on-metal THA (103 hips) or a hybrid metal-on-metal SRA (107 hips). All
surgeries were performed by three orthopedic surgeons, who used a posterior
approach.
The researchers prospectively collected perioperative and postoperative data,
and analyzed the clinical data for a minimum of 2 years.
Postop complications included three isolated traumatic dislocations and one
recurrent dislocation in the THA group, which required acetabular cup revision.
Two SRAs required revision for late head collapse. No postop femoral neck
fractures occurred in the SRA group, he said.
There was one case of loosening at 6 months postop in the resurfacing group,
which had shifted varus. There were also two cases of deep venous thrombosis in
both patient groups, he said.
Although the investigators did not report a significant difference in surgical
time between the two procedures, patients' length of stay in the hospital was
significantly shorter for the SRA group compared to the THA patients — 5 days
vs. 6.1 days for the THA group (P=.001).
"There was also a significant difference in return to work: 96% of the SRA
patients returned to their previous work within 1 year vs. 83% in the THA
group," Venditolli said.
Although patients in both groups demonstrated a high satisfaction rate and
achieved similar WOMAC and Merle d'Aubigné functional scores, "SRA patients had
better UCLA activity scores (7.1 vs. 6.3; P=.037) and returned to heavier
activities (P=.035)" after 2 years, he said.
"This randomized study shows that SRA and THA present a similar complication
rate, but distinctive complications," Venditolli said. "It also suggests that
SRA results in better function and improved patient activity in comparison to
THA.
"However, the effect of long-term fixation related to increased activity levels
is unknown. Long-term follow-up is necessary to determine the survivorship of
SRA over THA," he said.
For more information:
Vendittoli P-A, Lavigne M, Lusignan D, Roy A-G. A randomized study comparing
surface replacement arthroplasty to total hip arthroplasty: 2-4 years follow-up.
F028-2. Presented at the 15th Triennial Congress of the Asia Pacific Orthopaedic
Association. Sept. 9-13, 2007. Seoul.
READ COMPLETE ARTICLE
Tuesday, September 25. 2007
Estimates of Healthcare-Associated Infections
CDC strives to understand how healthcare-associated
infections happen and to develop appropriate interventions.
A new report from CDC updates previous estimates of
healthcare-associated infections. In American hospitals
alone, healthcare-associated infections account for an
estimated 1.7 million infections and 99,000 associated
deaths each year. Of these infections:
- 32 percent of all healthcare-associated infection
are urinary tract infections
- 22 percent are surgical site infections
- 15 percent are pneumonia (lung infections)
- 14 percent are bloodstream infections
READ COMPLETE ARTICLE
Friday, September 21. 2007
2007-09-19 22:47:00
Nanotechnology diamond ice coatings could improve knee prostheses and solar
cells
There is a huge demand for medical implants for almost every body part you
can think of. As we have reported here before, the market for medical implant
devices in the U.S. alone is estimated to be $23 billion per year and it is
expected to grow by about 10% annually for the next few years. Implantable
cardioverter defibrillators, cardiac resynchronization therapy devices,
pacemakers, tissue and spinal orthopedic implants, hip replacements, phakic
intraocular lenses and cosmetic implants will be among the top sellers. Current
medical implants, such as orthopedic implants and heart valves, are made of
titanium and stainless steel alloys, primarily because they are biocompatible.
Unfortunately, in many cases these metal alloys with a life span of 10-15 years
may wear out within the lifetime of the patient. With recent advances in
industrial synthesis of diamond and diamond-like carbon film bringing prices
down significantly, researchers are increasingly experimenting with diamond
coatings for medical implants. On the upside, the wear resistance of diamond is
dramatically superior to titanium and stainless steel. On the downside, because
it attracts coagulating proteins, its blood clotting response is slightly worse
than these materials and the possibility has been raised that nanostructured
surface features of diamond might abrade tissue. That's not something you
necessarily want to have in your artificial knee or hip joints (although some of
the currently used implant materials cause problems as well). Researchers have
now run simulations that show that thin layers of ice could persist on specially
treated diamond coatings at temperatures well above body temperature. The soft
and hydrophilic ice multilayers might enable diamond-coated medical devices that
reduce abrasion and are highly resistant to protein absorption.
READ
COMPLETE ARTICLE
Thursday, September 20. 2007
Study: Surface replacement arthroplasty may offer advantages over THA
Canadian investigators said hip resurfacing resulted in greater patient activity
after 2 years.
By Robert Trace
1st on the web (September 19, 2007)
September 2007
SEOUL — Total hip arthroplasty is an established procedure with well-documented
complication rates and clinical results, but surface replacement arthroplasty
may offer additional clinical benefits to many patients, according to a group of
Canadian researchers.
"We decided in 2003 to do a comparative study of hip resurfacing, or surface
replacement arthroplasty (SRA), to the gold standard of total hip arthroplasty (THA),
since we were not aware of any direct prospective studies out there comparing
the two procedures," said Pascal-André Venditolli, MD, of the Maisonneuve-Rosemont
Hospital in Quebec.
He and his colleagues randomly assigned 210 hips to receive uncemented
metal-on-metal THA (103 hips) or a hybrid metal-on-metal SRA (107 hips). All
surgeries were performed by three orthopedic surgeons, who used a posterior
approach.
The researchers prospectively collected perioperative and postoperative data,
and analyzed the clinical data for a minimum of 2 years.
Postop complications included three isolated traumatic dislocations and one
recurrent dislocation in the THA group, which required acetabular cup revision.
Two SRAs required revision for late head collapse. No postop femoral neck
fractures occurred in the SRA group, he said.
There was one case of loosening at 6 months postop in the resurfacing group,
which had shifted varus. There were also two cases of deep venous thrombosis in
both patient groups, he said.
Although the investigators did not report a significant difference in surgical
time between the two procedures, patients' length of stay in the hospital was
significantly shorter for the SRA group compared to the THA patients — 5 days
vs. 6.1 days for the THA group (P=.001).
"There was also a significant difference in return to work: 96% of the SRA
patients returned to their previous work within 1 year vs. 83% in the THA
group," Venditolli said.
Although patients in both groups demonstrated a high satisfaction rate and
achieved similar WOMAC and Merle d'Aubigné functional scores, "SRA patients had
better UCLA activity scores (7.1 vs. 6.3; P=.037) and returned to heavier
activities (P=.035)" after 2 years, he said.
"This randomized study shows that SRA and THA present a similar complication
rate, but distinctive complications," Venditolli said. "It also suggests that
SRA results in better function and improved patient activity in comparison to
THA.
"However, the effect of long-term fixation related to increased activity levels
is unknown. Long-term follow-up is necessary to determine the survivorship of
SRA over THA," he said.
For more information:
Vendittoli P-A, Lavigne M, Lusignan D, Roy A-G. A randomized study comparing
surface replacement arthroplasty to total hip arthroplasty: 2-4 years follow-up.
F028-2. Presented at the 15th Triennial Congress of the Asia Pacific Orthopaedic
Association. Sept. 9-13, 2007. Seoul.
READ COMPLETE ARTICLE
Sunday, September 16. 2007
Study results outline dabigatran etexilate as potential thromboprophylaxis
therapy for patients undergoing total hip replacement surgery
RIDGEFIELD, Conn., Sept. 13 /PRNewswire/ -- Boehringer Ingelheim today
announced that the September 15 issue of The Lancet will publish results from
the RE-NOVATE study, which investigated dabigatran etexilate as a potential
therapy for patients undergoing total hip replacement surgery(1). The results
from this study demonstrate that both doses (220mg and 150mg) of the oral direct
thrombin inhibitor, dabigatran etexilate, administered for a median of 33 days,
were non-inferior to injectable enoxaparin in reducing the risk of venous
thromboembolism (VTE) after total hip replacement surgery with similar safety.
The primary endpoint of this trial was a composite consisting of total venous
thromboembolic events and all-cause mortality during treatment, which occurred
in 6.0% of the 220mg group and 8.6% of the 150mg group taking dabigatran
etexilate, versus 6.7% of the enoxaparin group. Importantly, a pre-specified
secondary outcome of major venous thromboembolism and venous thromboembolism-related
mortality was also similar between groups, occurring in 3.1% of the 220mg group
and 4.3% of the 150mg group taking dabigatran etexilate, versus 3.9% of the
enoxaparin group.
Anticoagulation-related bleeding is the primary safety concern during hip
replacement surgery, since major bleeding into the replaced joint can have a
detrimental impact on clinical outcome(2). Generally, few major bleeding events
were reported, occurring at 2.0% in the 220mg group and 1.3% in the 150mg group
for dabigatran etexilate, versus 1.6% in the enoxaparin group. Notably about
half of all major bleeding events started after surgery and before the first
dose of dabigatran etexilate. There were no major bleeding events reported after
hospital discharge in the dabigatran etexilate groups.
Data from frequent liver function monitoring showed that the frequency of
increases in liver enzyme concentrations with dabigatran etexilate is low during
the entire extended treatment period. Results showed that alanine
aminotransferase (ALT) elevation greater than three times the upper limit of
normal occurred in 5.3% enoxaparin group, as compared to 3.0% in the 150mg group
and 3.0% in the 220mg group taking dabigatran etexilate. Similarly, the
incidence of acute coronary events was low, with no significant differences
between all groups.
Current treatment guidelines recommend that patients undergoing knee or hip
replacement surgery receive thromboprophylaxis (treatment to prevent VTE) with
low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), fondaparinux or warfarin for at least 10
days after surgery. For patients undergoing hip replacement surgery, extended
thromboprophylaxis for up to 28-35 days is recommended.(3) The RE- NOVATE study
was designed consistent with these guidelines.
About dabigatran etexilate
Dabigatran etexilate is an investigational oral direct thrombin inhibitor
that specifically and reversibly inhibits thrombin, the key enzyme for blood
clot formation, and is currently in phase 3 development. In the RE-NOVATE study,
dabigatran etexilate was dosed once a day without routine coagulation
monitoring. Patients in the study received a fixed dose of dabigatran etexilate
and were not titrated during the duration of the study.
Further studies investigating dabigatran etexilate
Dabigatran etexilate is being investigated in multiple phase 3 trials that
are designed to investigate the oral direct thrombin inhibitor as a potential
treatment and prophylaxis for several thromboembolic disease conditions. The
phase 3 clinical trial program is expected to involve more than 27,000 patients
from Asia, Australia, Europe, the Americas, and South Africa.
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., based in Ridgefield, CT, is the
largest U.S. subsidiary of Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation (Ridgefield, CT) and
a member of the Boehringer Ingelheim group of companies.
The Boehringer Ingelheim group is one of the world's 20 leading
pharmaceutical companies. Headquartered in Ingelheim, Germany, it operates
globally with 137 affiliates in 47 countries and approximately 38,400 employees.
Since it was founded in 1885, the family-owned company has been committed to
researching, developing, manufacturing and marketing novel products of high
therapeutic value for human and veterinary medicine.
In 2006, Boehringer Ingelheim posted net sales of US $13.3 billion (10.6
billion euro) while spending approximately one-fifth of net sales in its largest
business segment, Prescription Medicines, on research and development. For more
information, please visit http://us.boehringer-ingelheim.com.
References
1. Lancet ref
2. Lotke PA, Lonner JH. Deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis: better living
through chemistry-in opposition. J Arthroplasty 2005;20:15-7
3. Geerts WH, Pineo GF, Heit JA et al. Prevention of Venous
Thromboembolism: The Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and
Thrombolytic Therapy. Chest 2004;126:338-400
Web site:
http://us.boehringer-ingelheim.com/
READ COMPLETE STORY
Monday, September 10. 2007
Metal ion levels in a triathlete with a metal-on-metal resurfacing arthroplasty
of the hip
R. De Haan, MD, Orthopaedic Resident1; P.
Campbell, PhD, Research Scientist, Associate Professor2; S. Reid, MD,
PhD, Sports Medicine Physician3; A. K. Skipor, MS, Research Scientist4;
and K. De Smet, MD, Orthopaedic Surgeon1
1 ANCA Medical Center, Krijgslaan 181, 9000 Gent,
Belgium.
2 J Vernon Luck Snr MD, Orthopaedic Research Center, Orthopaedic Hospital, 2400
S., Flower Street, UCLA, Los Angeles 90007, California, USA.
3 St. Helen’s Private Hospital, 186, Macquarie Street, Hobart, Tasmania 7000,
Australia.
4 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush Presbyterian St Luke’s, Medical
Center, Room 756, Cohn Research Building, 1735 West Harrison Street, Chicago,
Illinois 60612-3833, USA.
A prospective study of serum and urinary ion levels was undertaken
in a triathlete who had undergone a metal-on-metal resurfacing
arthroplasty of the hip four years previously. The one month study
period included the final two weeks of training, the day of the
triathlon, and the two weeks immediately post-race. Serum cobalt and
chromium levels did not vary significantly throughout this period,
including levels recorded on the day after the 11-hour triathlon.
Urinary excretion of chromium increased immediately after the race
and had returned to pre-race levels six days later. The clinical
implications are discussed.
READ
COMPLETE ARTICLE
Saturday, September 8. 2007
Researchers Find Better Way to Deliver Blood Thinner
FRIDAY, Sept. 7 (HealthDay News) -- A new gene-based dosing formula for the
anti-clotting drug warfarin should make it easier to prescribe the correct dose
of the blood thinner, researchers say.
Up to this point, doctors have had to engage in a trial-and-error process over
several weeks that left patients at risk of hemorrhaging from low doses or
developing blood clots with too-high doses.
"We already knew these genes affected warfarin dosing, but we didn't know how to
use that information clinically," researcher Dr. Brian Gage, medical director of
Barnes-Jewish Hospital's Blood Thinner Clinic, said in a prepared statement.
"But with this study, we've established a simple way to combine these genetic
factors with clinical factors in a dosing algorithm."
Gage and colleagues developed the formula based on study participants who had
undergone hip replacement or knee surgery. The study team focused on two genes,
VKORC1 and CYP2C9, which are known to affect the way warfarin operates inside
the body.
Using the new method, physicians head to a Web-based tool to calculate a
patient's initial dosage more accurately...
READ COMPLETE ARTICLE
|