|
Monday, May 3. 2010
New Data Reinforces the Proven Safety and
Effectiveness of the BIRMINGHAM HIP Resurfacing System
80-percent of US surgeons choose the BHR hip
as it outperforms all other metal-on-metal resurfacing devices MEMPHIS, Tenn., May 3 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- Recent new data(1)
presented at this year's American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS)
annual meeting reinforces the BIRMINGHAM HIP™ Resurfacing (BHR) System
as a safe and effective hip resurfacing device. The multi-site study,
performed by orthopedic surgeons practicing at nine Canadian academic
centers, showed that three years after surgery, 99.91% of their 3,400
hip resurfacing patients experienced no implant failure due to metal
wear debris. The BHR Hip was the most used resurfacing device in this
study.
This week, the Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) in New York City
will be holding a medical education course titled "Total Hip:
Replacement and Resurfacing" on May 7 and 8 for leading hip surgery
specialists from across the U.S. Chairing the course will be Edwin Su,
MD, of the Hospital for Special Surgery, and the teaching faculty will
include pioneering British surgeon Derek McMinn, MD, inventor of the BHR
hip.
During a press conference and Q&A webcast on Thursday, May 6, at 3
p.m. US EDT, 8 p.m. GMT, Joseph M. DeVivo, president of Smith & Nephew
Orthopaedics (NYSE: SNN, LSE: SN), the maker of the BHR Hip, will be
joined by Dr. Su and Mr. McMinn, as well as Scott Marwin, MD, an
orthopedic surgeon with New York University's Hospital for Joint
Diseases. The panel will review current data confirming the safety and
effectiveness of hip resurfacing and the BHR Hip. Smith & Nephew
Orthopaedics will host the call, and additional details are at the
bottom of this release.
The new study recently presented at the AAOS meeting aligns with
previously released BHR Hip data from other prestigious sources and
further addresses the metal wear debris concerns raised about
metal-on-metal hip implants. The BHR Hip's track record for longevity
remains unchallenged in the literature, as well. These sources include:
- The
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery published in January of this
year a study tracking 155 consecutive BHR patients over three years.
The data showed no revisions of BHR Hips due to metal wear, but
patients who received a competing metal-on-metal resurfacing device
were revised within three years of surgery at a rate of 3.4-percent
due to adverse tissue reactions.(2)
- The
Australian Orthopaedic Association's 2008 National Joint Replacement
Registry, a record of nearly every hip implanted in that country
over the previous 10 years, tracked 6,773 BHR Hips and found that
less than one-third of one-percent may have been revised due to the
patient's reaction to the metal component.(3)
- The
Australian Registry hip resurfacing data for 2009, 70-percent of
which comes from BHR Hip procedures, indicates that for men under
age 65, hip resurfacing performs at the same or a better rate than
total hip replacement. This registry also shows that the BHR Hip
remains successful in 95-percent of cases eight years after surgery,
whereas no other implant performs better than 94.7-percent just five
years after surgery.(4)
- Great
Britain's Oswestry Outcomes Centre's patient registry, which
tracked 5,000 BHR Hips implanted by 148 different surgeons in 37
countries over 10 years (1998-2008), reports that the BHR Hip
remains successful in 95.4-percent of all patient segments 10 years
after surgery. This registry also reported that 98.6-percent of
patients were "pleased" or "extremely satisfied" with their BHR Hip
implants 10 years after their resurfacing procedure.(5)
- Mr.
McMinn's clinical data, based on 3,095 hip resurfacing patients
implanted between 1997 and 2009, shows that more than 12 years after
surgery, the BHR hip remains successful in 99-percent of men aged 60
and over, and 97-percent for men under age 60.
"The BHR Hip's outcomes are remarkable when compared to other
resurfacing devices," said Dr. Marwin. "The depth and consistency of the
data collected globally shows the BHR Hip is truly different."
"For the right patients in my practice, hip resurfacing has proven to
be an excellent choice," said Dr. Su. "They have extremely high levels
of satisfaction after returning to their regular lifestyle."
To explain the patient advantages seen consistently in the
literature, surgeons indicate the key differences between the BHR Hip
and other resurfacing devices are its metal composition, its design
geometry and its surgical instrumentation.
The BHR Hip has a unique metallurgy heritage which goes back more
than 30 years and includes a first-generation metal-on-metal resurfacing
process which contributes to long-term survivorship of BHR Hip
recipients.
Additionally, the BHR Hip's design geometry replicates the natural
hip's ability to pull the body's own joint fluids into the ball and
socket interface, which is believed to be another source of its
best-in-class performance.
Of particular importance during hip resurfacing surgery is the
correct positioning of the acetabular cup, or hip socket. When this
component is not properly aligned, studies show that metal wear can
accelerate and resurfacing devices can fail before their time. Surgeons
believe that the instrument used to implant the BHR Hip is simpler and
more accurate than other devices' instruments, and may contribute to its
success.
"Just like the lubricating barrier in a healthy hip, there is a
natural fluid layer between the femoral head and the cup that the two
metal surfaces glide across during physical activity," said Mr. McMinn.
"If the surgeon malpositions the acetabular cup causing edge loading,
the lubrication is lost. It's equivalent to running a car engine without
lubrication oil. High wear will occur, resulting in premature
failure. Overall, it is a combination of the metal composition, the
design and the quality of the surgical technique that makes the BHR Hip
the safest resurfacing implant on the market."
"The bottom line is that the BHR Hip is not like other metal-on-metal
hip implants," said DeVivo. "Not only does it have the longest track
record of any resurfacing device, but the most esteemed medical
literature shows it outlasts other implants. It's in a class all its own
– it's safe and effective, and is the best choice for active patients."
Footnotes
(1) Beaule PE, Smith FC, Powell JN et al. A Survey on the Incidence
of Pseudotumours with MOM Hip Resurfacings in Canadian Academic Centres.
Podium presentation # 665. Proceedings of the American Academy of
Orthopaedic Surgeons Annual Meeting, New Orleans LA. 2010
(2) Langton DJ, Jameson SS, Joyce TJ, Hallab NJ, Natu S, Nargol AVF.
Early failure of metal-on-metal bearings in hip resurfacing and
large-diameter total hip replacement, A CONSEQUENCE OF EXCESS WEAR. J
Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010; 92-B: 38-46
(3) Table HT 46. Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint
Replacement Registry Annual Report. Adelaide: AOA; 2008.
(4) Table HT 46. Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint
Replacement Registry Annual Report. Adelaide: AOA; 2009.
(5) Robinson E, Richardson JB, Khan M. MINIMUM 10 YEAR OUTCOME OF
BIRMINGHAM HIP RESURFACING (BHR), A REVIEW OF 518 CASES FROM AN
INTERNATIONAL REGISTER. Oswestry outcome centre, Oswestry, UK.
About Us
Smith & Nephew is a global medical technology business, specialising
in Orthopaedics, including Reconstruction, Trauma and Clinical
Therapies; Endoscopy and Advanced Wound Management. Smith & Nephew is a
global leader in arthroscopy and advanced wound management and is one of
the leading global orthopaedics companies.
Smith & Nephew is dedicated to helping improve people's lives. The
Company prides itself on the strength of its relationships with its
surgeons and professional healthcare customers, with whom its name is
synonymous with high standards of performance, innovation and trust.
The Company operates in 32 countries around the world. Annual sales in
2009 were nearly $3.8 billion.
Forward-Looking Statements
This press release contains certain "forward-looking statements"
within the meaning of the US Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of
1995. In particular, statements regarding expected revenue growth and
trading margins discussed under "Outlook" are forward-looking statements
as are discussions of our product pipeline. These statements, as well
as the phrases "aim", "plan", "intend", "anticipate", "well-placed",
"believe", "estimate", "expect", "target", "consider" and similar
expressions, are generally intended to identify forward-looking
statements. Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown
risks, uncertainties and other important factors (including, but not
limited to, the outcome of litigation, claims and regulatory approvals)
that could cause the actual results, performance or achievements of
Smith & Nephew, or industry results, to differ materially from any
future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such
forward-looking statements. Please refer to the documents that Smith &
Nephew has filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission under
the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, including Smith &
Nephew's most recent annual report on Form 20F, for a discussion of
certain of these factors.
All forward-looking statements in this press release are based on
information available to Smith & Nephew as of the date hereof. All
written or oral forward-looking statements attributable to Smith &
Nephew or any person acting on behalf of Smith & Nephew are expressly
qualified in their entirety by the foregoing. Smith & Nephew does not
undertake any obligation to update or revise any forward-looking
statement contained herein to reflect any change in Smith & Nephew's
expectation with regard thereto or any change in events, conditions or
circumstances on which any such statement is based.
Trademark of Smith & Nephew. Certain marks registered US Patent and
Trademark Office.
Thursday, September 18. 2008
Medicare is going to decide if it should start discussions
about covering Hip Resurfacing soon. I am explaining this in layman's terms.
There are long processes that government goes through with technical terms, but
basically the public is invited to comment on what procedures will be discussed
for approval.
This is a chance for all hip resurfacing patients and
potential patients to make comments to Medicare. I have been told that Medicare
listens to surgeons, patients, patient advocates and the general public. This
is an opportunity for hip resurfacing to be covered by Medicare. I have also
been told that Medicare is the benchmark for most insurance companies. If
Medicare covers a procedure, then normally most insurance companies will also
cover the same procedure.
If you have had a hip resurfacing and would like to
encourage Medicare to cover Hip Resurfacing, please take time to comment. If
you need a hip resurfacing and would like to encourage Medicare to cover Hip
Resurfacing, please take time to comment.
According to the Yahoo Surface Hippy Survey of 855
patients, 460 patients were in the 50 – 69 year old category.
http://www.surfacehippy.info/survey/hipresurfacingsurvey.php
That means most patients that had one hip resurfacing will
probably need another in the future. If you will be 65 when you need your hip
resurfacing, I am sure you will want Medicare to cover the surgery. You don't
want to travel overseas like many of us had to.
I think Surface Hippies can make a difference if we all
take a few minutes to comment to Medicare.
I have prepared two letters that you
can copy and paste if you don't want to write one yourself. They are posted on
the Surface Hippy Website. If you visit the home page of the Surface Hippy
Website you can find more information and the sample letters
http://www.surfacehippy.info
The the url to the Comment Page on the Medicare Website is
listed below:
Click Here to Visit Medicare Comment Page
Please take a few minutes to post a comment.
We can make a
difference and this is our chance to be heard.
The closing date for comments is
September 28, 2008.
Tuesday, August 12. 2008
Link -
Read Complete Story by Clicking Here
August 12, 2008
The debate over U.S. health-care reform rages on. But why wait for someone
else to dictate your future? You have many options -- if you're willing to take
a vacation. If recovering from a medical procedure while lying on a palm-swept
beach, relaxing by the hotel pool, or shopping for terrific bargains sounds
good, then medical vacations may be exactly the right solution for you.
From hip replacement to heart surgery, more people are discovering the
advantages of traveling abroad for their medical needs.
A big growth industry
In just the past few years, medical vacations have gone from a tiny niche
market to an impressive growth story with substantial market-share gains. From
Mexico to India, Costa Rica to Thailand, hospitals are taking advantage of this
global trend. And U.S. companies are taking note as well. Aetna (NYSE: AET) and
Blue Cross Blue Shield of South Carolina are among the health-care companies
tailoring their corporate health insurance plans to give employees the
opportunity to head to India or elsewhere for surgeries such as knee
replacements and the more modern, less invasive approach to hip replacement, hip
resurfacing...
Read More
Tuesday, July 8. 2008
June 2008
Link
http://www.nbc11.com/msnbchealth/16748813/detail.html
Timmi Ryerson, a San Diego stock market analyst, says her left hip actually
works again, thanks to an orthopedic specialist in India.
...What's new about these procedures is not the exotic locales the three
chose, but the way they paid for their far-flung surgeries.
While at least 150,000 Americans travel abroad for medical care every year,
according to the American Medical Association, Ryerson, Mason and Davies
represent a small but growing category of medical tourist: patients whose
insurance companies have agreed to foot at least part of the bill.
"I think that's the solution to our health care crisis," said Davies, 53, whose
company plan, Delta Dental, maxed out his dental benefit, about $2,500, toward
the $30,000 he spent to repair damage caused by years of grinding his teeth, a
procedure that would have cost an estimated $80,000 in the United States.
Increasingly, some of the nation's larger employers and leading health insurers
agree.
Once the province of the poor and uninsured, medical tourism is gaining
attention of industry giants such as CIGNA, Aetna and Blue Cross/Blue Shield,
who say they either have begun or are considering pilot programs that provide
limited coverage for foreign care. One Montana firm, Employee Benefit Management
Services Inc., recently began offering medial tourism plans to its 120
self-insured clients in the Northwest...
"I just think that others need to be aware that they are able to have a safe
procedure done out of the country for a price at a third the cost," she said.
Ryerson, 61, said her private Blue Cross plan paid 80 percent of a $7,000 hip
resurfacing surgery in Chennai, India, that would have been about $55,000 in the
U.S. - if she could get it at all.
In 2006, the hip resurfacing device necessary for her surgery had just been
approved for U.S. use by the federal Food and Drug Administration and not many
domestic doctors had experience with it. Dr. Vijay Bose, her U.K.-certified
surgeon in India, had performed the surgery more than 1,100 times.
"Doctors here didn't know what they didn't know and I didn't want to be a guinea
pig," she said.
While she was there, Ryerson also had cosmetic surgery and dental work done at
her own expense...
Tuesday, January 8. 2008
Need health insurance? Better get to work
Do research to find the best individual plan
Link
http://www.kentucky.com/147/story/279530.html
By Jane Glenn Haas
THE ORANGE COUNTY REGISTER
If you are too young for Medicare but considering leaving a job that offers
group health insurance, it pays to do some research.
After a yearlong investigation, Consumer Reports has concluded that 89 percent
of the people younger than 65 who look for individual health insurance do not
buy it because it is too costly, because they are turned down for health reasons
or because benefits are inadequate.
"Private insurance is virtually out of the question for 76 percent of uninsured
Americans -- and those who do have insurance told us wrenching stories about the
high costs and poor coverage they receive," says Nancy Metcalf, health editor at
Consumer Reports.
She calls searching for private insurance "daunting" and a challenge to any
adult who hopes to retire early, loses a job, is self-employed or has an adult
child leaving a group plan.
"The nature of health insurance is that the only people profitably to insure are
those who are healthy," Metcalf says.
Question: Why can a person get coverage in one state but not in another?
Answer: The insurance industry is regulated on a state-by-state basis. There is
no uniformity. There are enormous differences in disqualifying medical
conditions.
Q: You cite PacificCare, which might exclude anyone who takes prescription
medications for high blood pressure, acid reflux, asthma, migraines, arthritis.
Aetna won't insure anyone who has had a hip or knee replacement. Other insurers
have equally onerous health hurdles. Some of those conditions are tough to avoid
after 50. What alternatives do we have?
A: It is very shocking to a lot of people. There is no good answer for the way
the individual insurance system works today. People just don't realize they are
only paying 25 percent or 30 percent of the premium when they have group
insurance. Consumer Reports found that the median out-of-pocket medical expenses
for the last 12 months were $2,264 for those with individual insurance vs. $973
for those with employer-based plans.
Q: You have many tales of insurance woe in your article. What's a person to do?
A: Start by going to www. healthinsuranceinfo.net to check out coverage in your
state. You really need to be careful leaving a group plan. There is a little
window for coverage.
The federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act provides some
protection if you are switching from job-based group coverage to an individual
plan even if you have a medical condition that could preclude insurance.
But to exercise your HIPAA rights, you first have to exhaust all job-based
coverage available, including COBRA, which allows you to continue in your
employer's plan for 18 months by paying the full cost plus 2 percent.
HIPAA is like a get-out-of-jail-free card for people with pre-existing
conditions. But you must apply for individual coverage within 63 days after your
old coverage ends.
Every state has to make sure there is at least one policy available to you if
you meet these conditions.
Q: Other suggestions?
A: Know your state laws.
Q: What are other ways people can educate themselves?
A: Go to www. consumerreports.org/health for unbiased comparisons and
www.eHealthInsurance.com for links to hundreds of insurance plans across the
country.
Wednesday, June 13. 2007
By Alan Ray LBHR with Dr. De Smet 12/15/2004 THE APPEAL LETTER TO CIGNA (NAU IS "national appeals unit") Dear CIGNA NAU: I have received your written notice, dated Aug. 27, 2004, denying my initial request for pre-authorization for left hip surface arthroplasty. With this letter and attachments, the request is being re-submitted for further consideration as an appeal of the initial denial. I am a 55-year-old male diagnosed in March of this year with end-stage osteoarthritis of the left hip, with “some component of dysplasia”. The result of the condition is that I am unable to engage in the athletic activities that have helped me control hypertension and maintain extremely low blood cholesterol levels (as demonstrated in my past two annual physicals). Despite a high-stress professional position and extremely demanding work schedules, I have managed to maintain my health…with the help of competitive handball, three to four times a week, and a rigorous regime of weight-resistance training, and aerobic conditioning. Now the activities that helped keep me healthy are closed to me. The physician who provided the initial diagnosis also made clear that, with a Total Hip Replacement, these activities would be closed to me for as long as I live. With that word from him, I set out to find an alternative. It is clear, from what I have read in the professional literature that, with a Total Hip Replacement, in addition to a high level of surgical and post-operative complications, there is an exceedingly high likelihood of dislocation in even basic activities... Read More
|