<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>

<rss version="2.0" 
   xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
   xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
   xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
   xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
   xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
   xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
   >
<channel>
    <title>Hip Resurfacing News - Approaches to Surgery</title>
    <link>http://www.hipresurfacingnews.com/</link>
    <description>What's new in hip resurfacing</description>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <generator>Serendipity 1.5.1 - http://www.s9y.org/</generator>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2010 15:48:11 GMT</pubDate>

    

<item>
    <title>Staples significantly increase risk of postoperative infection study</title>
    <link>http://www.hipresurfacingnews.com/archives/363-Staples-significantly-increase-risk-of-postoperative-infection-study.html</link>
            <category>Approaches to Surgery</category>
            <category>General Information</category>
            <category>Joint Replacement Information</category>
            <category>Medical Studies</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.hipresurfacingnews.com/archives/363-Staples-significantly-increase-risk-of-postoperative-infection-study.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.hipresurfacingnews.com/wfwcomment.php?cid=363</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.hipresurfacingnews.com/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=363</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Patricia Walter)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    &lt;b&gt;Staples significantly increase risk of postoperative infection study&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;b&gt;March 2010 Original Link&amp;#160;
&lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;http://www.orthosupersite.com/view.aspx?rid=62584&quot;&gt;
http://www.orthosupersite.com/view.aspx?rid=62584&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The use of staples to close wounds following orthopedic surgery - especially 
hip surgery - is associated with a significantly greater risk of wound infection 
than traditional suturing, according to orthopedic researchers from Norwich, 
England. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Six clinical trials &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Toby O. Smith, MSc, BSc (Hons), MCSP, and colleagues analyzed the results of 
six trials that compared staples and sutures used for wound closure following 
orthopedic procedures in adult patients. The six clinical trials involved 683 
wounds. Of these cases, 322 patients underwent suture closure and 351 patients 
had staple closure, according to a British Medical Journal press release. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The authors found that wounds closed with staples were more than three times as 
likely to develop a superficial wound infection compared to wounds closed with 
sutures. In a subgroup analysis of patients undergoing hip surgery, the risk of 
developing a wound infection was found to be four times greater after staple 
closure than suture closure, according to the release. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Staples not recommended &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The researchers found no significant difference between staples and sutures 
in the development of inflammation, discharge, dehiscence, necrosis and allergic 
reaction. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The authors called for high quality, well-designed trials to confirm their 
findings. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although the quality of evidence from the six trials was generally poor, the 
authors concluded, &amp;quot;With the current evidence, however, patients and doctors 
should think more carefully about the use of staples for wound closure after hip 
and knee surgery.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
•Reference: &lt;br /&gt;
Smith TO, Sexton D, Mann C, et al. Sutures versus staples for skin closure in 
orthopaedic surgery: meta-analysis. BMJ. [Published online ahead of print March 
16, 2010]  
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2010 08:45:39 -0700</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hipresurfacingnews.com/archives/363-guid.html</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>A Modified Posterior Approach Preserves Femoral Head Oxgenation During Hip 2010</title>
    <link>http://www.hipresurfacingnews.com/archives/362-A-Modified-Posterior-Approach-Preserves-Femoral-Head-Oxgenation-During-Hip-2010.html</link>
            <category>Approaches to Surgery</category>
            <category>Dr. De Smet</category>
            <category>HR Issues</category>
            <category>Medical Studies</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.hipresurfacingnews.com/archives/362-A-Modified-Posterior-Approach-Preserves-Femoral-Head-Oxgenation-During-Hip-2010.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.hipresurfacingnews.com/wfwcomment.php?cid=362</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.hipresurfacingnews.com/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=362</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Patricia Walter)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    &lt;b&gt;A Modified Posterior Approach Preserves Femoral Head Oxgenation During Hip 
Resurfacing 2010&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Steffen RT, De Smet KA, Murray DW, Gill HS&amp;#160; 2010 Mar 22&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Original Link&amp;#160;
&lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20334994?dopt=AbstractPlus&quot;&gt;
&lt;font size=&quot;1&quot;&gt;http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20334994?dopt=AbstractPlus&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, 
University of Oxford, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford, UK.	&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In 11 patients, the oxygenation was measured in the superolateral quadrant of 
the femoral head during resurfacing with a modified posterior approach, designed 
to preserve the blood supply, using a gas-sensitive electrode. These were 
compared with measures from 10 patients in whom the standard posterior approach 
was used. The modified approach patients maintained a significantly (P &amp;lt; .005) 
higher amount of relative oxygenation after the approach, 78% (standard 
deviation [SD], 45%) vs 38% (SD, 26%), and acetabular component implantation, 
74% (SD, 56%) vs 20% (SD, 28%). The modified posterior approach, unlike the 
standard extended approach, does not significantly compromise the blood supply 
to the head; and we recommend this approach be considered for hip resurfacing.
					 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Sun, 28 Mar 2010 09:53:20 -0700</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hipresurfacingnews.com/archives/362-guid.html</guid>
    
</item>

</channel>
</rss>