<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>

<rss version="2.0" 
   xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
   xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
   xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
   xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
   xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
   xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
   >
<channel>
    <title>Hip Resurfacing News - HR Devices</title>
    <link>http://www.hipresurfacingnews.com/</link>
    <description>What's new in hip resurfacing</description>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <generator>Serendipity 1.1.2 - http://www.s9y.org/</generator>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 22:10:48 GMT</pubDate>

    

<item>
    <title>Dr. Bose Transcript of Chat on Aug. 16, 2008</title>
    <link>http://www.hipresurfacingnews.com/archives/249-Dr.-Bose-Transcript-of-Chat-on-Aug.-16,-2008.html</link>
            <category>BHR</category>
            <category>Doctors</category>
            <category>General Information</category>
            <category>HR Devices</category>
            <category>HR Issues</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.hipresurfacingnews.com/archives/249-Dr.-Bose-Transcript-of-Chat-on-Aug.-16,-2008.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.hipresurfacingnews.com/wfwcomment.php?cid=249</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.hipresurfacingnews.com/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=249</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Patricia Walter)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    &lt;div align=&quot;center&quot;&gt;
						&lt;table border=&quot;1&quot; width=&quot;468&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;3&quot; bordercolor=&quot;#000080&quot; height=&quot;90&quot;&gt;
							&lt;tr&gt;
								&lt;td width=&quot;77&quot;&gt;
								&lt;p align=&quot;center&quot;&gt;
								&lt;font face=&quot;Verdana&quot; size=&quot;2&quot;&gt;
								&lt;img border=&quot;0&quot; src=&quot;http://www.surfacehippy.info/images2/bosesmall.jpg&quot; width=&quot;50&quot; height=&quot;58&quot;&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
								&lt;td width=&quot;373&quot;&gt;
					&lt;p align=&quot;center&quot;&gt;
					&lt;font face=&quot;Verdana&quot; size=&quot;2&quot;&gt;
					&lt;span style=&quot;background-position: 0% 0%; font-weight:700&quot;&gt;
					&lt;a title=&quot;Dr. Bose answers questions about hip resurfacing from patients during a chats on Aug. 16, 2008&quot; style=&quot;text-decoration: none&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;http://www.surfacehippy.info/doctorchats.php&quot;&gt;Click here to view a Transcript of the Surface Hippy Chat with Dr. Bose on Aug. 16, 2008 
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
					&lt;/font&gt;
								&lt;/td&gt;
							&lt;/tr&gt;
						&lt;/table&gt;		
			&lt;/div&gt;	
 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 15:10:48 -0700</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hipresurfacingnews.com/archives/249-guid.html</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>First Zimmer Durom Hip Replacement Lawsuit Filed</title>
    <link>http://www.hipresurfacingnews.com/archives/245-First-Zimmer-Durom-Hip-Replacement-Lawsuit-Filed.html</link>
            <category>General Information</category>
            <category>HR Devices</category>
            <category>HR Issues</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.hipresurfacingnews.com/archives/245-First-Zimmer-Durom-Hip-Replacement-Lawsuit-Filed.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.hipresurfacingnews.com/wfwcomment.php?cid=245</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.hipresurfacingnews.com/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=245</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Patricia Walter)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    &lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Link -
&lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;http://www.prweb.com/releases/zimmer/durom/prweb1199584.htm&quot;&gt;
Read Complete Article by Clicking Here&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;The Maglio Christopher &amp;amp; Toale Law Firm has filed suit in Federal District 
Court against Zimmer, Inc. on behalf of a client with a failed Durom Hip 
Replacement Cup. It is believed that this is the first lawsuit to be filed 
against Zimmer regarding its controversial Durom Hip Replacement System. The 
Firm plans to file additional Durom lawsuits against Zimmer on behalf of other 
clients in the coming weeks.&lt;/i&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Sarasota, FL (PRWEB) August 12, 2008 -- 
The Maglio Christopher &amp;amp; Toale Law Firm has filed suit in Federal District Court 
against Zimmer, Inc. on behalf of a client with a failed Durom Hip Replacement 
Cup. Zimmer is a multinational medical device manufacturer. It is believed that 
this is the first lawsuit to be filed against Zimmer regarding its controversial 
Durom Hip Replacement System. The Firm plans to file additional Durom lawsuits 
against Zimmer on behalf of other clients in the coming weeks. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Problems with the Zimmer Durom were put in the spotlight on April 22 of this 
year when a highly respected orthopedic researcher, surgeon, and director of the 
Dorr Institute for Arthritis Research and Education, wrote a letter to his 
colleagues at the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons, criticizing the 
device. In his letter, Lawrence Dorr, MD, reported that 14 of the 165 Durom hip 
systems implanted at his clinic needed to be surgically revised within two years 
of implantation. He wrote: &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;In the first year the x-rays looked perfect. We have revised four that did not 
have any radiolucent lines or migration (and John Moreland revised one). These 
early cups fooled us, but the symptoms were so classic for a loose implant that 
we operated on the patients. When we hit on the edge of the cup it would just 
pop free. As time goes by the cups begin developing radiolucent lines. We now 
have one cup at two years that has actually migrated a short distance. It has 
tilted into varus. We do not believe the fixation surface is good on these cups. 
Also there is a circular cutting surface on the periphery of the cup that we 
believe prevents the cup from fully seating. We stopped using the cup after the 
first revisions.&amp;quot; 
It was another three months before Zimmer finally stopped selling its Durom 
Hip Resurfacing System. On July 22, 2008, Zimmer issued a press release 
announcing that it was &amp;quot;temporarily suspending marketing and distribution of the 
Durom Acetabular Component in the U.S. on a voluntary basis, while the Company 
updates labeling to provide more detailed surgical technique instructions to 
surgeons and implements its surgical training program in the U.S.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In its release, Zimmer admitted that the Durom cup was failing at a higher 
than expected rate. However, it went on to blame the high rate of failure on 
surgeon error rather than on the Durom cup. Orthopedic surgeons familiar with 
the Durom have disagreed, indicating that the widespread nature of the failures 
shows the problem to be with the cup and not surgeon error. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Zimmer estimates that as many as 12,000 patients in the United States 
currently have the Durom Cup implanted in their hips. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;About the Maglio Christopher &amp;amp; Toale Law Firm &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Maglio Christopher &amp;amp; Toale Law Firm has successfully represented patients 
across the nation in obtaining compensation for injuries caused by defective hip 
and knee joint replacement devices. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 17:30:05 -0700</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hipresurfacingnews.com/archives/245-guid.html</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>Smith &amp; Nephew revenues hit £500m for first time</title>
    <link>http://www.hipresurfacingnews.com/archives/243-Smith-Nephew-revenues-hit-500m-for-first-time.html</link>
            <category>Articles 2008</category>
            <category>BHR</category>
            <category>HR Devices</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.hipresurfacingnews.com/archives/243-Smith-Nephew-revenues-hit-500m-for-first-time.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.hipresurfacingnews.com/wfwcomment.php?cid=243</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.hipresurfacingnews.com/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=243</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Patricia Walter)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    &lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;font color=&quot;#0000FF&quot;&gt;Link&amp;#160; &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;http://www.birminghampost.net/birmingham-business/birmingham-business-news/manufacturing-business/2008/08/07/smith-nephew-revenues-hit-500m-for-first-time-65233-21489175/&quot;&gt;
Click here to read complete story&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;August 7, 2008&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Europe&#039;s largest medical devices firm, Smith &amp;amp; Nephew, which manufactures hip 
implants in Birmingham, has posted better-than-expected second-quarter earnings 
as revenues hit £500 million for the first time, boosting its stock.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The group confirmed its outlook for the full year, including the impact of 
problems at its Plus Orthopaedics, where the company revealed it had uncovered 
&amp;quot;unacceptable&amp;quot; sales practices three months ago.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Chief executive David Illingworth said: &amp;quot;We have generated quarterly revenues of 
$1 billion (£512 million) for the first time, as a result of a very solid 
performance across all of our businesses.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;In Reconstruction we have seen good growth in both our hip and knee product 
lines; in Trauma the actions we have taken in sales management have begun to pay 
off; Endoscopy has delivered double-digit revenue growth and in Advanced Wound 
Management we have outperformed the market. We are confirming our guidance for 
the full year and we believe that the long term outlook for our business is 
excellent,&amp;quot; he added.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Orthopaedic Reconstruction, global hip revenue growth was a solid seven per 
cent due to good contributions across all products and regions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Birmingham Hip Resurfacing System now has an estimated 3.5 per cent share by 
volume of the total US hip market after only two years in the market.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Investors welcomed the performance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nomura Code analyst Charles Weston said: &amp;quot;All the divisions did well on their 
sales and they&#039;ve confirmed that the sales hit from Plus will be $100 million 
(£51 million), which is effectively positive because there are no new 
negatives.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pre-tax profit rose to £80 million from £75.3 million a year earlier. Sales were 
£512 million, an underlying increase of eight per cent, or 23 per cent on a 
reported basis.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 18:00:19 -0700</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hipresurfacingnews.com/archives/243-guid.html</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing Growing More Popular</title>
    <link>http://www.hipresurfacingnews.com/archives/239-Metal-on-Metal-Hip-Resurfacing-Growing-More-Popular.html</link>
            <category>BHR</category>
            <category>Doctors</category>
            <category>General Information</category>
            <category>HR Devices</category>
            <category>HR Issues</category>
            <category>Research</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.hipresurfacingnews.com/archives/239-Metal-on-Metal-Hip-Resurfacing-Growing-More-Popular.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.hipresurfacingnews.com/wfwcomment.php?cid=239</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.hipresurfacingnews.com/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=239</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Patricia Walter)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    &lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;font size=&quot;3&quot; color=&quot;#000080&quot;&gt;Link - &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;http://www.modernmedicine.com/modernmedicine/Modern+Medicine+Now/Metal-on-Metal-Hip-Resurfacing-Growing-More-Popula/ArticleNewsFeed/Article/detail/534829?ref=25&quot;&gt;
&lt;font size=&quot;3&quot; color=&quot;#000080&quot;&gt;Click here to see full article&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Aug. 8, 2008&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Since its introduction a decade ago, metal-on-metal hip resurfacing has 
become increasingly popular because it may conserve femoral bone, increase 
functional ability and be easier to revise than other procedures, according to 
an article published in the August issue of the Journal of Bone &amp;amp; Joint Surgery.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Michael A. Mont, M.D., of Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, and a colleague reviewed 
clinical results - primarily from studies conducted in England, Australia and 
Western Europe -- and highlighted 10 important lessons learned during the past 
10 years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The researchers found that metal-on-metal hip resurfacing now accounts for about 
10 percent of total hip arthroplasties. Among the lessons they highlight is that 
patient selection is the key to success. They cite Australian data on more than 
10,000 patients showing that metal-on-metal hip resurfacing is associated with 
similar or improved survivorship compared to standard total hip arthroplasty in 
men under age 65 but not in men over age 65, and that metal-on-metal hip 
resurfacing is associated with a higher risk of short-term failure in men over 
age 65 and in all women.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;In the Australian registry, hips that underwent resurfacing as treatment for 
osteoarthritis have had better survival than those that underwent resurfacing 
for the treatment of developmental dysplasia, inflammatory arthritis and 
osteonecrosis,&amp;quot; the authors write. &amp;quot;In summary, resurfacing hip arthroplasty has 
had a tremendous increase in popularity because of the potential benefits of 
femoral bone conservation, possible increased functional ability, and ease of 
potential revision procedures. In young men, the survivorship has been similar 
to that of standard total hip arthroplasty.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although none of the authors received outside funding or grants in support of 
their research, one or more of them reported that they or their family members 
received grants or payments from Wright Medical and DePuy during the past year.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#160;&lt;/p&gt;
 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 17:00:21 -0700</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hipresurfacingnews.com/archives/239-guid.html</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>Smith &amp; Nephew posts first $1B quarter</title>
    <link>http://www.hipresurfacingnews.com/archives/238-Smith-Nephew-posts-first-1B-quarter.html</link>
            <category>BHR</category>
            <category>General Information</category>
            <category>HR Devices</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.hipresurfacingnews.com/archives/238-Smith-Nephew-posts-first-1B-quarter.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.hipresurfacingnews.com/wfwcomment.php?cid=238</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.hipresurfacingnews.com/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=238</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Patricia Walter)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    August 7, 2008 &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;b&gt;&lt;font size=&quot;1&quot;&gt;Link &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bizjournals.com/memphis/stories/2008/08/04/daily35.html&quot;&gt;
&lt;font size=&quot;1&quot;&gt;
http://www.bizjournals.com/memphis/stories/2008/08/04/daily35.html&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Smith &amp;amp; Nephew PLC reported revenue of $1 billion for the fiscal second 
quarter ending June 28, a 23 percent increase compared to $813 million for the 
year-ago quarter. This is the company&#039;s first ever $1 billion quarter. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Based in London, Smith &amp;amp; Nephew (NYSE: SNN) is a global medical technology 
business with 8,800 employees worldwide. The company&#039;s orthopedic 
reconstruction, orthopedic trauma and clinical therapies divisions are based in 
Memphis. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the second quarter, the company reported net income of $198 million, an 
increase of 18.6 percent compared to $167 million in the second quarter last 
year. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Revenues for the Memphis-based reconstruction unit grew by 8 percent to $396 
million. Global hip revenues grew 7 percent in the quarter. While the 2-year-old 
Birmingham Hip Resurfacing System now has a 3.5 percent share of the total U.S. 
hip market, management said sales growth slowed a bit in the quarter on 
competitive pressures. U.S. knee revenues grew 12 percent in the quarter. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The trauma and clinical therapies division grew 5 percent in the quarter to $171 
million. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Management said revenues in both units were strongly impacted by the purchase of 
the former Plus Orthopedics Holding AG. The purchase plunged second quarter 
revenues down an estimated $19 million and profits down by $9 million. The 
company said bringing Plus on board will cost $100 million in the next year. &lt;br /&gt;
 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 16:54:12 -0700</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hipresurfacingnews.com/archives/238-guid.html</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>FDA wants surveillance net for orthopedic devices</title>
    <link>http://www.hipresurfacingnews.com/archives/237-FDA-wants-surveillance-net-for-orthopedic-devices.html</link>
            <category>BHR</category>
            <category>FDA Approval</category>
            <category>HR Devices</category>
            <category>HR Issues</category>
            <category>Research</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.hipresurfacingnews.com/archives/237-FDA-wants-surveillance-net-for-orthopedic-devices.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.hipresurfacingnews.com/wfwcomment.php?cid=237</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.hipresurfacingnews.com/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=237</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Patricia Walter)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    &lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Link&amp;#160;
&lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;http://www.govhealthit.com/online/news/350502-1.html&quot;&gt;
http://www.govhealthit.com/online/news/350502-1.html&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/b&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;storybyline&quot;&gt;By Peter Buxbaum&amp;#160;
Published on August 4, 2008&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Food and Drug Administration has proposed a 
program that would query public and private databases to help study the efficacy 
of orthopedic implants. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
FDA will issue a request for quotations next month in an effort to identify 
companies that could evaluate orthopedic implant registries for participation in 
the program. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The program is part of the broader Sentinel Initiative FDA launched earlier this 
year. The broader effort is intended to monitor and provide early warnings of 
potential problems with FDA-approved medical products. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The implant program would “create a national network of registries for the FDA 
in support of the Sentinel Initiative,” according to an FDA announcement posted 
July 25. Implants of interest would include total hip, total knee, hip 
resurfacing, intervertebral disc implants and ankle devices. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The program would create a distributed network to enable FDA to query multiple 
data sources for information about medical products. As envisioned, queries to 
the network would be accomplished with minimal data transfer and would protect 
patient privacy. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
FDA’s current post-market surveillance programs require “health care 
professionals and patients to first recognize an association between an adverse 
effect and a medical product, and then report it to FDA,” an FDA spokesperson 
said. “Most adverse events are never reported, and when they are, the 
information provided is incomplete.” &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
FDA officials envision being able to search government databases, such as the 
Medicare database, private and public medical claims databases, and electronic 
health record systems, the spokesperson said. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The proposed evaluations of the orthopedic implant registries will lead to 
recommendations for involvement of the most promising data sources, the FDA 
announcement states. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Sentinel Initiative “could also ultimately facilitate data mining and other 
research-related activities,” the spokesperson added. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 21:01:09 -0700</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hipresurfacingnews.com/archives/237-guid.html</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>Complaints Undermine Hip Device </title>
    <link>http://www.hipresurfacingnews.com/archives/236-Complaints-Undermine-Hip-Device.html</link>
            <category>General Information</category>
            <category>HR Devices</category>
            <category>HR Issues</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.hipresurfacingnews.com/archives/236-Complaints-Undermine-Hip-Device.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.hipresurfacingnews.com/wfwcomment.php?cid=236</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.hipresurfacingnews.com/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=236</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Patricia Walter)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    &lt;b&gt;&lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/24/business/24hip.html?em&amp;ex=1217044800&amp;en=02f20df95e46a6b6&amp;ei=5087&quot;&gt;
					&lt;font size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;Read Original Link Here&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;font size=&quot;4&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;	&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;By
						BARRY MEIER July 24, 2008 &lt;/div&gt;
									
						&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
						&lt;a title=&quot;More information about Zimmer Holdings Incorporated&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/business/companies/zimmer_holdings/index.html?inline=nyt-org&quot;&gt;Zimmer Holdings&lt;/a&gt;, the nation’s biggest producer of 
						orthopedic devices, says it will suspend sales of an 
						artificial hip component that some doctors have 
						complained was failing at a high rate.						
						&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The company also lowered its earnings outlook as a 
						result of the suspension, and its shares fell sharply 
						Wednesday.						&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In recent months, some doctors have complained that 
						the device, a hip socket known as the Durom cup, was 
						failing in their patients, who then had to undergo 
						replacement surgery.						&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Zimmer said its investigation had determined that the 
						product was not defective. But it stated that even some 
						experienced surgeons had found it difficult to implant. 
						The company said it expected to resume sales once 
						specialized training for doctors had begun.						&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Since it was first sold in the United States in 2006, 
						the Durom cup has been implanted in more than 12,000 
						patients. Zimmer said it expected the overall need for 
						early replacement in patients would be low. But Zimmer 
						data and interviews with doctors suggest that hundreds 
						of patients might need such procedures in coming years.						&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Some doctors said their patients had not had problems 
						with the cup.						&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The company also said the sales halt would cut $20 
						million to $30 million from its sales estimates. Zimmer 
						said it expected that earnings for the year would be 
						$4.05 to $4.10 a share, down from its earlier forecast 
						of $4.20 to $4.25 a share.						&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In composite trading on the New York Stock Exchange, 
						shares of Zimmer, which is based in Warsaw, Ind., fell 
						$4.87 a share to close at $66.01 a share. Bruce Nudell, 
						an analyst at UBS who covers medical devices, said that 
						the company had not issued any warnings that sales would 
						be halted.						&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;“They had given hints that there would not be a 
						recall but this came as a surprise,” Mr. Nudell said.						&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The issue with the device surfaced in April when a 
						surgeon in Los Angeles, Dr. Lawrence Dorr, publicly 
						warned other orthopedists about cup failures his 
						patients were experiencing. In response, Zimmer said it 
						would start an investigation but said it saw no reason 
						to take added action like halting sales.						&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;At the time, Zimmer also cited European data showing 
						that the device was doing well there. But the version of 
						the device used outside the United States is slightly 
						different from the one used here. Also, while doctors 
						here use it in traditional hip replacement, surgeons in 
						other countries used it in a relatively new kind of hip 
						surgery known as resurfacing, which involves somewhat 
						different surgical techniques.						&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Zimmer, which announced the sales suspension late 
						Tuesday, said that its investigation found that using 
						the cup required a higher degree of precision. 						&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Dr. Dorr, who said he had stopped using the device 
						last year, said he did not plan to start reusing it. 						&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;“It is a bad design,” he said.						&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Mr. Nudell, the analyst, said that other doctors were 
						happy with the cup, but he expected that Zimmer might 
						see a 50 percent drop in the product’s use when sales 
						resumed. 						&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;As a result of halting sales, Zimmer said that it was 
						also suspending United States premarketing trials of its 
						system for resurfacing, the process that is used in 
						Europe. That decision will put it further behind 
						competitors that already have such products on the 
						American market.&lt;/p&gt;
 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 16:10:30 -0700</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hipresurfacingnews.com/archives/236-guid.html</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>Zimmer Hip Issue Delays Resurfacing System, May Help Rivals </title>
    <link>http://www.hipresurfacingnews.com/archives/235-Zimmer-Hip-Issue-Delays-Resurfacing-System,-May-Help-Rivals.html</link>
            <category>General Information</category>
            <category>HR Devices</category>
            <category>HR Issues</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.hipresurfacingnews.com/archives/235-Zimmer-Hip-Issue-Delays-Resurfacing-System,-May-Help-Rivals.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.hipresurfacingnews.com/wfwcomment.php?cid=235</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.hipresurfacingnews.com/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=235</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Patricia Walter)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    			&lt;b&gt;July 23, 2008&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;Original Link - 
		&lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;http://money.cnn.com/news/newsfeeds/articles/djf500/200807231327DOWJONESDJONLINE000786_FORTUNE5.htm&quot;&gt;
		Click Here&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Zimmer Holdings Inc.&#039;s (ZMH) U.S. sales suspension 
		for &amp;quot;Durom&amp;quot; replacement hip parts will further delay progress in 
		bringing a bone-sparing hip system to the U.S. market, which could 
		benefit smaller competitors.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Zimmer announced Tuesday that it has 
		temporarily stopped selling Durom parts - which are cups used to make 
		replacement hips - because U.S. surgeons need retraining to avoid 
		problems. Since Durom is part of a so-called hip resurfacing system 
		Zimmer is studying now, and hoped to bring to the U.S. in a few years, 
		Zimmer also halted the U.S. resurfacing study. &amp;quot;We are suspending 
		enrollment until further notice,&amp;quot; said Cheryl R. Blanchard, senior vice 
		president of research and development and chief scientific officer at 
		Zimmer, during a conference call with analysts Wednesday.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Due to the Durom suspension, &amp;quot;there will be some delay 
		beyond that 2011 period that we earlier referenced&amp;quot; for a 
		hip-resurfacing rollout, added James T. Crines, Zimmer&#039;s chief financial 
		officer.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;By preserving bone for potential future surgeries, hip 
		resurfacing is seen as a market-expanding technology that could bring 
		younger patients into the nearly $5 billion global replacement hip 
		market. Thomas Weisel analyst Raj Denhoy believes resurfacing sales 
		could represent 10% of total replacement hip sales in the U.S. by 2012.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
		Smith &amp;amp; Nephew PLC (SNN) won Food and Drug Administration approval in 
		May 2006 to bring the first modern resurfacing system to the U.S. Corin 
		Group PLC ( CRG.LN), another U.K. firm, won FDA approval for its system 
		last summer, but uptake has been slowed by issues at Stryker Corp. (SYK), 
		which is marketing Corin&#039;s device in the U.S.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Corin product 
		slowdown has benefited Smith &amp;amp; Nephew, and signs that industry 
		heavyweight Zimmer won&#039;t be marketing a competitive product as soon as 
		hoped is another positive development.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Shares of Smith &amp;amp; Nephew, which 
		Piper Jaffray upgraded to buy from neutral on Tuesday, recently traded 
		up 1.4% to $57.74.&lt;br /&gt;
		Zimmer officials did not estimate a new timeline for when a resurfacing 
		system might roll out in the U.S. On the company&#039;s first-quarter 
		earnings call in April, Crines said 2011 was the earliest date, 
		following some other delays in the program. He also said that Zimmer&#039;s 
		sales, marketing and product development efforts would remain focused on 
		the other 90% of the replacement hip market in the near-term.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;He 
		reiterated that plan on Wednesday&#039;s call.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Wright Medical Group Inc. (WMGI) 
		is another potential beneficiary from Zimmer&#039;s delay if it can finally 
		secure approval for its resurfacing product. Wright has been in 
		regulatory limbo at the FDA for years and hasn&#039;t explained the reason, 
		although management has said the company still expects approval.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
		Wright has a better chance to capitalize in the near term by seeking to 
		capture some lost Durom business from Zimmer, because Wright has similar 
		technology. Shares of the company recently traded 3% higher to $31.10.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
		Zimmer shares, hurt by the Durom issue and a cut to 2008 guidance, 
		recently traded down 5.5% to $66.94.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;-By &lt;PERSON&gt;Jon Kamp&lt;/PERSON&gt;, Dow Jones 
Newswires&lt;/div&gt;
 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 16:00:37 -0700</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hipresurfacingnews.com/archives/235-guid.html</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>Transcript of Dr. Mont Live Chat July 16, 2008</title>
    <link>http://www.hipresurfacingnews.com/archives/227-Transcript-of-Dr.-Mont-Live-Chat-July-16,-2008.html</link>
            <category>Approaches to Surgery</category>
            <category>Doctors</category>
            <category>HR Devices</category>
            <category>HR Issues</category>
            <category>Joint Replacement Information</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.hipresurfacingnews.com/archives/227-Transcript-of-Dr.-Mont-Live-Chat-July-16,-2008.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.hipresurfacingnews.com/wfwcomment.php?cid=227</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.hipresurfacingnews.com/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=227</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Patricia Walter)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    	&lt;div align=&quot;center&quot;&gt;
						&lt;table border=&quot;1&quot; width=&quot;75%&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;3&quot; style=&quot;border-collapse: collapse&quot;&gt;
							&lt;tr&gt;
								&lt;td width=&quot;75&quot;&gt;
								&lt;a title=&quot;Join Dr. Mont in the Surface Hippy Chat Room July 16 at 8 pm EST&quot; href=&quot;http://www.surfacehippy.info/doctorinterviews/montinterview.php&quot;&gt;
								&lt;img border=&quot;0&quot; src=&quot;http://www.surfacehippy.info/doctorinterviews/drmontsm.jpg&quot; width=&quot;75&quot; height=&quot;99&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
								&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;p align=&quot;center&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;background-position: 0% 0%&quot;&gt;
					&lt;font size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;
					&lt;a title=&quot;Dr. Mont answers questions about hip resurfacing from patients during chat on July 16, 2008&quot; href=&quot;http://www.surfacehippy.info/montchat708.php&quot;&gt;
					Read the transcript of the questions and answers from the 
					Dr. Mont Chat on July 16&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
							&lt;/tr&gt;
						&lt;/table&gt;
					&lt;/div&gt;
					 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 12:18:02 -0700</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hipresurfacingnews.com/archives/227-guid.html</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>What is The Most Popular Hip Resurfacing Device?</title>
    <link>http://www.hipresurfacingnews.com/archives/217-What-is-The-Most-Popular-Hip-Resurfacing-Device.html</link>
            <category>BHR</category>
            <category>HR Devices</category>
            <category>Research</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.hipresurfacingnews.com/archives/217-What-is-The-Most-Popular-Hip-Resurfacing-Device.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.hipresurfacingnews.com/wfwcomment.php?cid=217</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.hipresurfacingnews.com/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=217</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Patricia Walter)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    &lt;div align=&quot;center&quot;&gt;
&lt;a title=&quot;855 hip resurfacing patients tell what hip resurfacing device they received&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;http://www.surfacehippy.info/mostpopularhrdevice.php&quot;&gt;
&lt;img border=&quot;0&quot; src=&quot;http://www.surfacehippy.info/images/populardevice08.jpg&quot; width=&quot;250&quot; height=&quot;252&quot; align=&quot;center&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;center&quot;&gt;
&lt;a title=&quot;855 hip resurfacing patients answer the question - what is the most popular hip resurfacing device?&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;http://www.surfacehippy.info/mostpopularhrdevice.php&quot;&gt;What is the most popular hip resurfacing device? 
&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;center&quot;&gt;
&lt;a title=&quot;See the results of 855 hip resurfacing patients&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;http://www.surfacehippy.info/mostpopularhrdevice.php&quot;&gt;855 patients answer that question in the Yahoo 
Surface Hippy Survey.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;center&quot;&gt;
&lt;a title=&quot;Complete survey of 855 hip resurfacing patients answering questions about the hip resurfacing experience&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;http://www.surfacehippy.info/survey/hipresurfacingsurvey.php&quot;&gt;View the results of the complete Yahoo Surface Hippy Survey here.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt; 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 14:51:40 -0700</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hipresurfacingnews.com/archives/217-guid.html</guid>
    
</item>

</channel>
</rss>